Subcommittee on Railroads
Hearing on
Railroad Security
05-05-2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSE
BACKGROUND
WITNESSES
PURPOSE
This hearing will examine
current issues of preparedness, processes, and resources affecting
security of rail transport-freight, intercity
passenger, and commuter.
BACKGROUND
Railroad security has
become the focus of increased attention in the post-9/11 era,
especially after the recent bomb detonations
in a Madrid commuter rail station. Passenger rail operations include
intercity operations (principally Amtrak) and short-haul commuter
operations (such as the Long Island Rail Road in New York and Sound
Transit in the Seattle area). Both forms of rail passenger service
involve a substantial degree of "walk-on" or unreserved travel,
and in most cases do not have controlled departure access or a
passenger manifest comparable to the regime for commercial aviation.
Freight rail operations
involve a substantial amount of cargo container traffic, usually
originating at major ports of entry
for foreign trade, as well as large quantities of various hazardous
materials, e.g., various petroleum products and chlorine. Railroad
tracks-whether used for freight or passenger service, or both-are
necessarily exposed to many miles of ready access and line-of-sight
available to someone seeking to do harm either to a train or to
the infrastructure (track, signals, bridges, tunnels, etc.). Some
aspects of rail security involve intermodal connections, e.g.,
the transfer of cargo containers between or among ocean, rail,
and motor transport. Thus, freight railroads are directly affected
by proposed changes in access and credential requirements at port
facilities and other points of traffic interchange between rail
and other forms of transport.
Unlike other modes of transport, the infrastructure used by trains
is privately owned in almost all cases by a railroad, usually the
sole or principal user of that same infrastructure. The most notable
exceptions to congruent ownership and operations are Amtrak (outside
the Amtrak-owned Northeast Corridor) and many commuter rail operations,
which operate on tracks owned by one or more freight railroads
or, in the Northeast Corridor, by Amtrak.
Larger rail carriers (including Amtrak) maintain their own company-funded
police forces. By federal statute, officers in these forces may
also exercise law enforcement powers in any jurisdiction in which
their employing railroad operates [49 U.S.C. 28101].
Federal statutes relating to acts of sabotage or destruction against
railroads have accreted over many decades. Some have been enacted
as part of the regulatory regime for transportation (e.g., 49 U.S.C.
20138, prohibiting willful tampering with railroad safety devices),
others as part of the federal criminal code (Title 18, United States
Code). Identical legislation to modernize some of the rail-related
provisions of Title 18 was recently introduced in both the House
and the Senate (H.R. 4143 and S. 2289). The Senate Commerce Committee
recently approved S. 2216, which would require a variety of risk
assessments and studies of various aspects of rail security, as
well as authorizing $515 million in railroad security improvement
grants and $777 million in FY 2005 funds for Amtrak security improvements.
WITNESSES
PANEL I
Hon. Allan Rutter
Administrator
Federal Railroad Administration
Mr. Chet Lunner
Assistant Administrator
Office of Maritime and Land Security
Transportation Security Administration
Department of Homeland Security
PANEL II
Mr. Ed Hamberger
President
Association of American Railroads
Mr. Ernest R. Frazier, Sr., Esq.
Chief of Police and Security Department
Amtrak
Mr. Dan Duff
Chief Counsel and Vice President of Government
American Public Transportation Association
Mr. Ed Wytkind
President
Transportation Trades Department
AFL-CIO
PANEL III
Mr. James Dermody
President
Long Island Rail Road
Mr. Rick Tidwell
Deputy Executive Director
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation
|