The latest terror alert, issued for financial landmarks in New York, Washington,
and New Jersey, has sparked skepticism in some quarters. Fears are being raised
that the American public is becoming increasingly jaded by announcements of heightened
terrorist threat levels.
The latest terror threat alert issued by the U.S. government is the sixth
such heightened alert status since the attacks of September 11, 2001. But with
no actual attack yet materializing, experts say many Americans may be suffering
from what might be called "alert fatigue."
In New York, contractor Tom Le Grecca says that despite the higher security
alert there, life goes on as normal.
"You're on a higher sense of awareness than usual, but life goes on and everybody's
working and everybody shows up and just deal with the traffic and the security
issues," he said.
John Pike, a longtime defense and security analyst with GlobalSecurity.org
says people are becoming immune to the warnings, but he says this latest threat
may wake people up because the information is so specific.
"People had stopped paying attention to these color-coded alerts because
they didn't know what to do about them and nothing ever happened," he said. "This
one is different. It is sufficiently specific that, at least in the affected
areas, people are going to be very focused on it."
But news that much of the information on which the alert was based is several
years old has sparked a mix of fear, skepticism and even suspicion about political
motives in an election year. Larry Johnson, former deputy director of the State
Department's Counter-terrorism office and a veteran of the CIA, labels the alert
as "an overreaction and unwarranted."
"There are some who become, you know, frightened and very concerned," he
said. "And there are others who say the, you know, 'there they go again' syndrome.
And it becomes no big deal, and in fact, raises the suspicion that it's being
done for political reasons, you know, as part of the campaign."
Speaking in New York Tuesday, Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge strongly denied
any political motivation behind the alert.
"The detail, the sophistication, the thoroughness of the information, if
you had access to it, you'd say we did the right thing," he said. "Government
should let the public know about situations like this. It's not about politics.
It's about confidence in government telling you when they get the information."
Subsequent news stories quote unnamed government officials as saying some
portion of the intelligence pointing to terrorist targeting in New York, Washington
and New Jersey was in fact more recent than earlier reports had suggested.
Former counter-terrorism official Larry Johnson says the government has to
be more judicious in issuing terrorist warnings to keep the public from becoming
"I admit that there are wolves out there in the world. I'm not saying that
there is no threat or that the terrorism is non-existent, but I am saying that
we have to be very careful about going out and providing people information
that then does not pan out," he said.
Experts say the public is also getting a mixed message from the government.
People are being told, on the one hand, to be on the alert because of possible
terrorist activity, but they are also being urged to go to work or shop just