The Department of Homeland Security Needs to Fully Adopt a Knowledge-Based
Approach to Its Counter-MANPADS Development Program.
GAO-04-341R, January 30.
In late 2002, terrorists fired surface-to-air missiles
at an Israeli airliner departing from
Mombasa, Kenya—the first time man-portable air defense systems
(MANPADS) had
been used to attack commercial aircraft in a non-combat zone. Given
concerns about
the vulnerability of the commercial airline industry and the potential
impact of an
attack in the United States, you requested that we conduct an assessment
of the
federal government’s efforts to address the MANPADS threat
against commercial
aircraft, including its nature and extent; the Department of Defense’s
monitoring of
Stinger missiles exported to other countries; and U.S. bilateral
and multilateral efforts
to address international MANPADS proliferation. After we began
work on this
assessment, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) took steps
to initiate a
2-year system development and demonstration program for a counter-MANPADS
system and awarded the initial contracts in January 2004. On December
4, 2003, we
briefed your staff on our views about DHS’s approach to developing
the system. This
report summarizes that information and transmits the portion of
the briefing related
to DHS’s counter-MANPADS development effort (see encl. I).
Our assessment of the
other federal efforts to address the threat is ongoing, and we
expect to complete our
report in the spring of 2004.
Background
Due in part to the Mombasa attack, the White House convened a task
force to
develop a strategy to reduce the MANPADS threat against commercial
aircraft. In
reviewing available technical countermeasures, the task force identified
an on-board
jammer (directed infrared countermeasure, or DIRCM) as the most promising
technology to meet current threats while potentially satisfying operational
constraints imposed by the commercial aircraft industry such as minimizing
the cost
to operate and maintain these systems.
The Congress
directed DHS to submit a plan to develop and demonstrate a
counter-MANPADS device for commercial aircraft.1 On October 3,
2003, DHS
released a solicitation that outlines a 2-year, two-phased system
development
and demonstration program to produce prototype systems that would
satisfy
performance, operational, and cost constraints. In Phase I, which
begins in
January 2004, DHS intends to conduct preliminary design and analysis
activities.
In Phase II,
which begins about 6 months later, they plan to develop and test
the
prototypes.
The objective of the DHS program is to (1) migrate existing
military countermeasure
technologies to the civil aviation environment and (2) minimize
the total life-cycle
cost of the system, which includes development, procurement,
installation, operation
and support costs. The solicitation focuses primarily on the
DIRCM concept, which
combines a missile warning system (MWS) to detect a missile
launch and a laser to
jam the guidance system of the missile. DOD currently uses
DIRCM technology on
some of its large transport aircraft, such as the C-17.
Results in Brief
DHS faces significant challenges in
adapting a military counter-MANPADS system to
commercial aircraft. These challenges include establishing
system requirements,
maturing technology and design, and setting reliable cost estimates.
For instance,
DHS has to account for a wide variety of aircraft types in
designing and integrating
the system. Our past work on the best practices of product
developers in government
and industry has found that the use of a knowledge-based approach
is a key factor in
successfully addressing such challenges.
This approach includes
the use of exit
criteria or controls to ensure that sufficient knowledge has
been attained at critical
phases of the product development process. Based on input we
provided during the
course of our review, DHS updated its initial solicitation
to incorporate these
knowledge-based exit criteria. We think this a positive first
step, and we are
recommending that the Secretary of Homeland Security ensure
that the knowledgebased
approach is fully implemented throughout the course of its
counter-MANPADS
development program. DHS fully concurred.
Read Full Report [1.5 MB pdf]
------------------
1 House Report 108-76, p. 84. |